Monday, 9 June 2014

The Organizer (1963)

  'The Organizer' (I compagni) is a 1963 Italian film directed by Mario Monicelli and starring Marcello Mastroianni.

  The factory workers of a small town in Turin, Italy decide to go on strike to obtain better working conditions. They enlist the help of a professor (Mastroianni), who is passing through.

  Monicelli is different from other Italian directors, as his films don't focus the crazy and camp (Pasolini, Fellini), or harsh neo-realism (Rossellini), but rather Italian Comedies. They aren't spoof or slapstick, and use a mixture of crazy Italian archetypes, unusual situations (rebelling against authority) and sad endings. 'The Organizer' is a fantastic ensemble comedy, with a large cast and great acting.

  The film does feel, partially, like Rossellini's hard-hitting war trilogy, with the truths of poor living conditions shown explicitly. The characters include every Italian stereotype imaginable, including a crazy fat man, ladies with attitude, and loud children. The unflinching realism, matches well with the comedic characters and creates a funny and dramatic film. The narrative is linear and quite predictable, until the shock finale. Monicelli's films rarely end in happiness, so I should have expected the events of the end.

  The wonderful characters are acted by some of Italy's finest. Marcello Mastroianni is widely known as Italy's greatest actor (thanks to '8 1/2'), and he appears in films by some of the world's greatest directors including Altman, Angelopoulos, Petri, Visconti and, of course, Fellini. He might be the best aspect of this film. Even his presence in the film elevates it to a high standard. There can't be many actors who can play the part of a fish-out-of-water professor any better. The scene where he gives a speech to persuade the workers to strike longer, sent shivers down my neck. The first time this has happened for a speech scene in a film.

  The whole film is a resounding delight, even more enjoyable than 'The Great War'. It takes a while to get into, but when the characters are fully introduced and the professor arrives, the film is mesmerising.


TO CONCLUDE
An unexpected pleasure, that is powerful, funny and acted to perfection.

SCORE
80

Friday, 6 June 2014

The Marquise of O (1976)

  'The Marquise of O' (Die Marquise von O...) is a 1976 German film directed by Eric Rohmer.

  Set in 1799 Italy, the Marquise of O's father's house is being invaded by Russian forces. She attempts to escape but is caught by Russians and they attempt to rape her. The Count (Bruno Ganz) saves her by scaring them away, and lets her sleep in her bed. The Russian forces surrender and all is well. Until a few months later when the Marquise realizes she is pregnant. After confirmation, the family send her into exile, and the father's identity is investigated.

  The final film in the 'Eric Rohmer Collection' (at last!), is completely different from every other film in the collection. You can still tell its a Rohmer film, but everything has changed drastically. The most notable difference is that this is a period film set in the 18th Century. Clothes, props and locations are all suited to that time period, eliminating the fashion atrocities present in his other films. All these things add to the mise-en-scene, giving the film an entirely different feeling. This also effects the cinematography, which is tinged brown giving this film a old quality to it. It's more interesting visually then the majority of Rohmer films, but its still not that great.

  The plot develops very slowly. The first ten minutes is action packed during the invasion of the citadel, but the pace slows immediately afterwards. The story itself is similar, as the beginning is exciting while the rest of the film never surpasses dull. Rohmer promises us edge of your seat action, and delivers bland talking and sobbing. The film revolves around a "Who's the father?" conundrum, when it's obvious who the father is from the first 20 minutes. There is only one male character which isn't a family member of the Marquise, so it's bound to be him. The Whodunnit lasts until the last 10 minutes, where the expected is revealed. I'm not sure if it's because I have been watching an abundance of 'Game of Thrones' and 'True Detective' lately, but I found the whole film absolutely boring.

  The acting is to a good quality, with a film-stealing performance from Bruno Ganz (Adolf Hitler in 'Downfall') and some very sobby acting from Edith Clever (Die Marquise). I'm not sure why the film is a German production (perhaps the French got bored of him), but it sort of lends itself to the film. In his French films, the characters talk about love in the typical French way, but there is none of that here. There isn't any talking about boring relationships in bedrooms and there is no trips to cafes with secret lovers. It's a side of Rohmer I have never seen before, or even knew existed, but I can't say it's revolutionary or even moderately exciting.

  The film has a unique and confusing premise, which is: they are Russians, speaking German and living in Italy. The film is directed by a Frenchman, and I watched the whole thing with English subtitles. The film is possible with the help of five countries! Sad to say this is the film's greatest achievement.


TO CONCLUDE
Very different from anything else I have seen from Rohmer, but the story is a bit rubbish, the pace is slow and the whole film is resoundingly dull.

SCORE
62

Thursday, 5 June 2014

Vive L'Amour (1994) and What Time is It Over There? (2001)

  'Vive L'Amour' (Ai qing wan sui) and 'What Time is it Over There?' (Ni na bian ji dian) are 1994 and 2001 Taiwanese films directed by Tsai Ming-Liang. I decided to review them both together for a change.

'Vive L'Amour' is about three separate characters whose lives unexpectedly meet in an unsold apartment. May-Lin is the estate agent, Ah-Jung is the guy she unexpectedly has sex with, and Hsiao-Kang is the salesman who is living in the apartment (unknown to them).

  In 'What Time is it Over There?', A watch seller, Hsiao-Kang, is trying to come to terms with his father's death. His mother is becoming increasingly insane, so he tries to spend as much time as possible out of the house. He sells Shiang-chyi his watch, and has the urge to change every clock he sees to CEST (the time in Paris).  Meanwhile Shiang-chyi travels to Paris and befriends a girl.

 To celebrate buying a new region free Bluray and DVD player, I decided to start watching Ming-Liang's films on region 1 discs. Taiwan seems to be one of the best countries for films, with master directors Hou Hsiao-Hsien and Edward Yang making films there. Ming-Liang is very critically acclaimed, but I did know his films were different from Hsiao-Hsien's and Yang's works. From watching the segment of Ming-Liang in 'A Story of Film: An Odyssey', I learnt that he believes in the most pretentious saying "If you drink, you must piss or cry". So his films contain lots of drinking, lots of pissing and lots of crying. If you see someone drink in one of his films, you could play the "Will he piss or cry? game". Seeing someone piss on screen is the least cinematic thing ever. It shows how his films encapsulates everyday life, without removing the toilet stuff, to create a realistic portrayal of society. You probably never thought The Terminator took a piss several times during the plotline of each of the films, but I'm going to be honest here, no-one really cares. Seriously Ming-Liang, removing the "man pissing in bottle" scene in 'What Time is it Over There?' or "Lady sits on toilet scene" in 'Vive L'Amour' would improve the films significantly. There is no plot or character development in these scenes, so they are pointless and disgusting.

  Something Ming-Liang did use from the Yang and Hsiao-Hsien films was the long take. When I heard about the term "long take" for the first time, I thought how boring they must be, and how no cuts would irritate me. Films like 'The Travelling Players', 'A City of Sadness' and 'Berlin Alexanderplatz' immediately disproved this idea and I now adore the brilliance of the long take. However, Ming-Liang's long takes seems to return to my pre-conceptions. The shots may be composited nicely and use artificial lights impressively, but the long duration emphasizes the fact that nothing happens on-screen whatsoever. They are not so much boring, as tedious and annoying. So little happens in them, I could have fast forwarded x2 the entire films and missed nothing. Character's rarely speak to each other and spend most of the runtime in beds crying, sleeping or walking through vacant corridors and rooms. I'm sure Ming-Liang would think me writing this review on a laptop alone in my room, would be high quality entertainment. Well, it's not.

  Ming-Liang is not afraid to show the gritty depressing realism of life. In 'Vive L'Amour' there is a scene where the young salesman attempts to slit his wrists. There's another scene where the insurance saleslady cries for 10 minutes (a painfully long take). Both films contain sprinklings of very bleak comedy, most notably in 'What Time is it Over There?', which contains some genuinely laugh out loud moments. The long duration and the seriousness of the scenes, are mismatched with some subtle neo-slapstick.

  I found 'What Time is it Over There?' the better film, because of the improved visuals and the superior story. The film deals with death and the constant expiration of time, as well as featuring a legendary cameo. 'Vive L'Amour' is an earlier film, but is far duller and way more irritating. The story weaves in and out of the three protagonists lives, based around the one apartment where neither of them (legally) live. There is impressive acting from Yang Kuei-Mei (May Lin), and the film is filled with bizarre and unexpected moments, but the the film never gels together.

Vive L'Amour



TO CONCLUDE
I admire the beauty, but the film is painfully slow. I was uninterested for the entirety of the running time.

SCORE
65

What Time is it Over There?



TO CONCLUDE
Equally as slow as the previous Ming-Liang, but is a much more interesting, funny and watchable film. Although it's still not enjoyable.

SCORE
69

Tuesday, 3 June 2014

Padre Padrone (1977)

  'Padre Padrone' (Father and Master) is a 1977 Italian film directed by Paolo Taviani and Vittorio Taviani. It won the Palme D'Or and is based on the life of Gavino Ledda.

  In Sardinia, a father storms into his son's classroom, demanding that he stays at home to look after the herd. He reluctantly agrees, and is forced to life as a uneducated Shepard, constantly being bossed around and beaten by his father. The story skips to when Gavino is now 20 years old. He attempts to leave for Germany, but his father refuses to sign the form. Eventually he is enrolled into the army, where he is taught education and the wonders of classical music.

  The Taviani brothers have an impressive repertoire of work, ranging from 1970 to present day. They directed 'Kaos', a film my dad insists I watch, and the emotional Epic 'The Night of San Lorenzo'. This is the first film I have seen of theirs, and it's not what I expected. The synopsis above, makes the film sound like a neorealist Rossellini film, which it is... Sort of...

  The film does indeed start off as a neo-realist film, with the father storming into the classroom and taking the child away, but as the film progresses, it starts to look more and more like a Pasolini film. It first became visible from the running around the tent, but was confirmed with the sheep milking and the farting. It's completely bizarre to combine the seriousness of child abuse, with the farcical humour of Pasolini and Fellini.

  The film is based on the life of author Gavino Ledda, and he actually appears introducing and concluding the film. After introducing the film, the camera tilts up to show the father about to enter the classroom. The real-life Gavino walks up to the father and hands him the stick saying "my father had this as well". This was my favourite moment in the film, as he purposely breaks the forth wall, for no reason at all. It's genius while simultaneously being pointless. This isn't the only experimenting done in the film, there is a scene where the child Gavino, talks to a sheep in his mind. Another where Gavino is sitting on a hilltop playing the accordion, when white writing appears on screen. I always like experimenting in films ('Hausu'), but it doesn't match the tone of despair which is apparent throughout the runtime. Neo-realist and farcical really do not mix well, and that is the film's downfall.

  Everything else, from the barren cinematography to the typical Italian acting is great. The film feels like an Epic, spanning 13 years, and deals with many subjects (including bestiality), so it is deserving of the Palme D'Or.



TO CONCLUDE
Not what I was expecting. The strange atmosphere works in some situations but not others. I feel very mixed, but I would say it's worth watching, just for how bizarre it is.

SCORE
71

Cinematographer Analysis-Sacha Vierny

  Please note that the following was submitted for a university assignment. I got 68/100 (two marks from a first), which helped me make up for my awful marks for E-Business and Human Resource Management (44 and 41). While researching about Sacha Vierny on the internet, there was only one or two articles, so I decided this was good enough to post as he is a remarkable cinematographer that needs more recognition. There is a reason I chose him as oppose to the fifty, or so, more recognisable cinematographers and thats because the visuals in every one of his films is flawless. Without further ado, here it is:

Cinematographer Analysis-Sacha Vierny

  For Cinematography Assignment 2, I had to “research the work of a particular cinematographer and produce a study that analyses the working practices and key aspects of the cinematographer’s style”. The cinematographer I chose was Sacha Vierny. Throughout his career, he worked briefly with Luis Bunuel, Agnes Varda, although his main collaborators were Alain Resnais and Peter Greenaway. He directed films with critically acclaimed and avant-garde film directors, purposely to stay away from the Hollywood mainstream. He has a tremendous love of his work, and is notable for his dark lighting and his experimentation with styles. He experiments with all of his films, using improvised techniques and styles. ‘Hiroshima Mon Amour’ is his first notable feature length film, and his first collaboration with Alain Resnais. However, their most iconic collaboration would be on ‘Last Year in Marienbad’ in 1961.


(Figure 1, Last Year in Marienbad, 1961)

  This screenshot is taken from Vierny’s second film with Resnais titled ‘Last Year at Marienbad’. After ‘Hiroshima mon Amour’, Resnais was an established auteur, with an ambition to experiment. His films include scattered narratives, a plot equivalent to a puzzle, and a mixture of dreams and reality. Vierny had to convey all of this in the cinematography. The first aspect which is notable from the image above is the depth of field. Resnais (2001) said “he was using auxiliary lenses to get more depth of field than would have otherwise been possible”. Vierney used auxiliary lenses to increase the depth of field far above the standard for the industry, creating shots where the character is in focus in the foreground, while the sculptures and trees are in focus in the background. As unusual as this technique is, it adds to the dream-like aesthetic of the film.

  The shot doesn’t look realistic, with the strange shaped trees and the endless path. More of a sketch than a camera shot. What adds to the abstract of the shot was the decision to shoot black and white. This was not a budgetary decision, but an artistic vision as Freeman (2007) states “black and white allows more expression in the modulation of tone in contemporary texture, the modelling of form and defining shape”. The texture and detail of the inside of the Baroque mansion, and the vast gardens would be invalid in colour. Black and white was used between 1900s-1950s, and induces nostalgia into the viewer. The past and distant memories are what ‘Last Year in Marienbad’ is all about.

  Over-exposure is another technique Vierny used in ‘Last Year in Marienbad’. The bright white colours add to the mise-en-scene of the film.

“In style Marienbad is finely appropriate to its context. The use of over exposure, rapid cutting to break down the normal temporal order and to juxtapose related scenes and gestures, are obvious and quite literal representations of the activities of memory, particularly its associative functions”
 (Ward,1968)

  The unconscious memory differs from real life in many ways. Altering the exposure of the film, creates an unrealistic and uncomfortable atmosphere, which is perfect for a film like ‘Last Year in Marienbad’ due to the obscure narrative and the unclear remembering structure of the script.

  Combining the lighting with the staging creates a distinct uncomfortable atmosphere. Sutton (2009) agrees with this and says “Vierny and Resnais manage to exploit the flatness of photography on-screen, using careful techniques of staging and foreshortening as well as exquisite lighting and sensitive film stock”. The film has a style copied by films like Stanley Kubrick’s ‘The Shining’ and music videos like Blur’s ‘To the End’.


(Figure 2, A Zed and Two Noughts, 1986)

  In 1986, Vierny worked on his first film with Peter Greenaway, A Zed and Two Noughts. From the first shot, Vierny presents many of the techniques he would use in the next sixteen years, with Greenaway, his second major collaborator. The shots are planned before recording, and symmetry is an important aspect. The letters ‘Z’, ‘O’ and ‘O’ consume precisely equal amounts of the frame, with vertical pillars dividing through each letter.  The composition of their work is filled with shots of the subject being in the centre of the frame, with a prop, or an actor further back to the far left or right. The four intersections that the Rule of Thirds create, land exactly on the centre ‘O’. Despite this being a well composited shot, I feel there is too much for the viewer to look at. The spectator’s eye is not drawn to a specific part of the shot, but all of it so the spectator can choose where to look on screen.

  Greenaway and Vierny experimented with many different light sources during the filming of A Zed and Two Noughts. Greenaway (2003) spoke about this and stated “We [Vierny and Greenaway] played games with the notion of light, about its source and how it works. We sat down and made a list of 26 different ways we could light a set”. All 26 methods of lighting are visible in A Zed and Two Noughts, which ranged from bonfires, candles and cathode-ray tubes to heat cameras and a rainbow. During the film, they experimented with natural, artificial, contemporary and industrial light sources that resulted in a distinct and unusual effect that strengthens the core ideas of the film. The film feels unnatural and fake due to the natural world being vacant from his films. Lawrence (1997) compares him to Resnais on this factor and says “As much a romantic in his way as Resnais, Greenaway persists in the hope for a natural world. Behind this death, evil and mediocrity is the natural landscape. The desire to believe reinforced by the knowledge that such a thing does not exist”.  The characters are trapped in an artificial and claustrophobic prison, which Vierny and Greenaway both created.

“The cinema is routed, as it is in photography, tends heavily toward illusionistic realism, and the allegorical material Greenaway includes usually proves disruptive to the viewer’s illusion that a meaningful world is unfolding”.
(Willoquet-Maricondi, 2001)

  The material and the atmosphere create an illusion that the characters are living in a dream grounded in reality, similar to Resnais’s ‘Last Year in Marienbad’. The illusion continued in all of Greenaway and Vierny collaborations.


(Figure 3, The Baby of Macon, 1993)

  Many of Greenaway and Vierny collaborations include the colour red. None of them more than ‘The Baby of Macon’, which has the colour red in nearly every shot whether in the foreground, background or costumes. The storyline chronicles the life of a baby who is believed to be the messiah, but human greed and corruption exploits the baby.  Greenaway’s aim appears to be to offend, with detestable characters, exploitive violence and a director who insists on breaking the forth wall constantly throughout. What Vierny does to support this aim, is to inject the majority of shots with the colour red and to not include a single close-up in the whole film. Greenaway’s intention of reminding the audience that the characters are acting in a play on stage is apparent with scenes including the play’s audience, and even scenes where they interact with the play. Vierny’s excess of medium to long shots reminds the viewer they are looking at a distance, similar to a play, rather than a film.

                        
(Figure 4, The Cook, the Thief, his Wife and her Lover, 1989)   (Figure 5, Samson Le Mariage Et L Enigme,dresde  1638, Rembrandt)

                               
 (Figure 6, The Draughtsman’s Contract, 1982)                                       (Figure 7, The Night’s Watch, 1642, Rembrandt)

                                  
      (Figure 8, The Baby of Macon, 1993)                                                              (Figure 9, Danae, 1636, Rembrandt)


  The films Vierny and Greenaway collaborated on in the 1980s-90s were visually inspired by the paintings of Rembrandt. Shown above, are comparisons between Rembrandt’s paintings in Greenaway/Vierny’s films, whether it is the framing of the top image, the costumes of the middle image or the tones and colours of the bottom image. Their films feel like, they were made in the seventeenth century. Vierny’s early style was similar, with the architecture in ‘Last Year at Marienbad’ being Baroque, but lacked the dark colours and the Rembrandt style of his Greenaway work. He has evolved stylistically during the 46 years of making films.

  All of Vierny’s work is concerned with experimenting with colour and lighting. Whether this is the control of the black and white and overexposure used in Resnais’s ‘Last Year in Marienbad’, or the large amount of different light sources used in Greenaway’s ‘A Zed and Two Noughts’.  His style has improved and differed over the decades, but he has always experimented with every one of his films.

Bibliography

Alain Resnais (October, 2001). ‘The Elegance of Sacha Vierny’ in ‘Positif’. Issue 488, page 44. Accessed on 25/03/2014.

Amy Lawrence, 1997. ‘Chapter 2’ in ‘The Films of Peter Greenaway’ pg62. Accessed on 24/04/2014.

Damian Sutton (2009). ‘Cinema’s Photographic View’ in ‘Photography, Cinema, Memory: The Crystal Image of Time’. Page 127. Available at http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=mhBic-4p3WUC&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&dq=sacha+vierny&source=bl&ots=TxHMno82V_&sig=nZrXdPadAO3il9pEs4WOG_4NUHs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=iMIsU_qWFseJ0AXlqYC4DA&ved=0CKsBEOgBMBE4KA#v=onepage&q=sacha%20vierny&f=false. Accessed on 21/03/2014.

Figure 1. Last Year in Marienbad (1961). From: Studio Canal. Directed by Alain Resnais. [film still]. Accessed on 24/04/2014.

Figure 2. A Zed and Two Noughts (1986). From ........... Directed by Peter Greenaway. [film still]. Accessed on 20/04/2014.

Figure 3. The Baby of Macon (1993). From Allarts. Directed by Peter Greenaway. [film still]. Accessed on 12/04/2014.

Figure 4. The Cook, the Thief, his Wife and her Lover (1989). From Vendex. Directed by Peter Greenaway. [film still]. Accessed on 25/04/2014.

Figure 5. Samson Le Mariage Et L Enigme, dresde (1638). Painted by Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn. Accessed on 13/04/2014.

Figure 6. The Draughtsman’s Contract (1982). From British Film Institute/Channel 4. Directed by Peter Greenaway. [film still]. Accessed on 25/04/2014.

Figure 7. The Night’s Watch (1642). Painted by Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn. Accessed on 13/04/2014.

Figure 8. The Baby of Macon (1993). From Allarts. Directed by Peter Greenaway. [film still]. Accessed on 12/04/2014.

Figure 9. Danae, (1636). Painted by Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn. Accessed on 13/04/2014
John Ward, 1968. ‘L’Annee derniere a Marienbad’ in ‘Alain Resnais on the Theme of Time’ pg57. Accessed on 14/04/2014.

Michael Freeman, 2007. ‘Composing with Light and Colour’ in ‘The Photographer’s Eye’ pg126. Accessed on 24/04/2014.

Paula Willoquet-Maricondi, 2001. ‘Z is for Zebra, Zoo, Zed and Zygote’ in ‘Peter Greenaway’s Post Modern/Post Structuralist Cinema’ pg163. Accessed on 14/04/2014.

Peter Greenaway, 2003, ‘Two Noughts- An Introduction by Peter Greenaway’ on ‘A Zed and Two Noughts’, dvd, BFI, Stephen Street, London. Accessed on 29/03/2014. 

Yi Yi: A One and a Two (2000)

  'Yi Yi: A One and a Two' is a 2000 Taiwanese film directed by Edward Yang.

  The Jian family are living in present day Taipei. The father, NJ, is a business man who bumps into former lover Sherry. His son Yang-Yang has trouble at school with teachers and girls, and uses his fathers camera to take photographs. His daughter Ting-Ting tries to date the boyfriend of the girl next door, his brother-in-law has money problems and his stepmother is in a coma after a stroke. The film follows them, through their every day lives, as they contemplate life.

  Not only is 'Yi Yi' Edward Yang's most famous and revered work, but it is also his last film, before he died in 2007 aged 59. It's my second time watching, and I admit that I forgot how much of a wonderful film this is. The run-time is three hours

  'Yi Yi' is an example of what a soap opera could be like, if it was perfect in every way possible. The story follows each separate family member as they experience love, loss and life. The audience experiences this at a distance, with shots ranging from medium-long shots, to shots where the camera is out of the room. There are few cuts, allowing the actors to express their characters to the utmost perfection. They are techniques that have been used before ('The Travelling Players', 'A City of Sadness'), but feel most welcome in this existential and peaceful character study.

  Films like this rely on good acting, which there is an abundance of. Nien-Jen Wu portrays the "bored of life" father/business man perfectly. He wrote the screenplays for many of Hou Hsiao-Hsien films, so it appears that he is generally excellent at everything. All of the cast captivates the audience, especially Jonathan Yang who plays Yang-Yang and Kelly Lee who plays Ting-Ting. They act so well, it feels like we are actually looking into the lives of real people.

  Everything about the film, from the visuals to the acting captivates the audience, and is even better the second time watching.



TO CONCLUDE
A simple and beautiful film. 3 hours of peaceful perfection.

SCORE
84

Friday, 30 May 2014

Love in the Afternoon (1972)

  'Love in the Afternoon' (L'amour l'apres-midi) is a 1972 French film directed by Eric Rohmer.

  Frederic is a lawyer living in the suburbs, and working in the city of Paris. He is married to Helene, who is pregnant with their second child. Frederic regrets being married and wants to be free, like when he was single. Soon enough, an old friend of Frederic, Chloe, returns to Paris and they both gradually become friends.

  My seventh Rohmer film, is probably his most famous. It has a 7.8 IMDB score, and has been remade as 'I Think I Love My Wife' in 2007 by Chris Rock. After watching the fantastic 'My Girlfriend's Boyfriend', I was anticipating another great film. However this was not to be. I personally do not see why 'Love in the Afternoon' is considered his magnum opus.

  This is the most "talkiest" Rohmer I have seen. It is what all the characters do in Rohmer films, but in this film it seems none of the characters shut up at all. That is how it feels after watching anyway. The best thing about the film is the fluidity. Everything flows at a pace and a scene is never longer than necessary. It does feel like a Truffaut film, due to the upbeat pace, but sadly, the film does not deliver like Truffaut does.

  Despite this being made earlier than 'A Good Marriage' there is no sign of its naff aroma that plagued many of his 80s productions (except a turtleneck sweater). It does, however, feature some tedious characters. Frederic may seem fine at first, but as the film proceeds, I gradually hated him more and more. His wife just had a baby, and he insists of meeting Chloe to make him feel "free again". Chloe is equally as bad for encouraging him. This culminates in two irritating and punchable protagonists, which is never good. This is also told from the man's perspective, rarely done in a Rohmer film.

  The two characters are portrayed by Bernard Verley (Frederic) and Zouzou (Chloe). The acting is average at best, but I think it's more the script which is the problem. There is only so much you can act when you are talking about love in a bedroom or a cafe. Maybe I have seen one too many of his films, but the constant talking crap never appealed to me. After the final film in the Rohmer box-set 'The Marquise of O', I plan to take a long, needed, break from Eric Rohmer.


TO CONCLUDE
I wasn't as bored in this one. The film is Rohmer at his most usual. It is not good or bad, just a considerable meh.

SCORE
66